Desiderata—a weekly publication for libraries and booksellers

Desiderata 001How come nothing can be found online about the little weekly periodical entitled Desiderata, a copy of which was found in a box of books the other day? It resembles the Clique in some respects, but unlike the latter, whose main job was to put collectors and booksellers in touch with one another, it aimed instead to provide ‘ a direct link between library and bookseller ‘.

The copy we found is probably fairly typical. It is issue number 36 of volume 8 and is dated September 9th 1955. Its 12 pages comprise an editorial in the form of a salutary story about a bookseller’s ring; there follows a rather silly defence of the inept ‘poet‘, Alfred Austin, against the entirely justifiable description of him by Evelyn Waugh as a ‘obnoxious nonentity ‘. Five whole pages of Wanted adverts from the British Museum then follow, and the rest of the issue is taken up by what appear to more Wanted ads from various public libraries, some small ads from booksellers and a full page ad from the eminent Guildford booksellers Traylen. A miscellany of literary notes and announcements takes up the back page.

The British Museum books wanted advert is the most interesting feature of the magazine. Listed in this case from ‘Tovey’ to ‘Trial’, the items demonstrate how keen the Library was (and presumably still is) to hold all editions of a particularly title, however seemingly obscure. This is, after all, its raison d’etre. However, one example listed seems out of place. There was a call put out for the 1915 second edition and its 1930 reprint of Pitman’s Dictionary of Secretarial Law and practice edited by Philip Tovey. Why would a 1930 reprint differ in any meaningful way from the 1915 second edition? Insisting on reprints for the sake of completeness is per se rather ludicrous.

Surprisingly, only three titles would be prime targets for the ‘Boring Book’s section of Bizarre Books—without doubt the funniest book ever published. Here they are:

Samuel Townsend, A Complete Ready Reckoner for Cotton Warps (1860)

St. Trefuge, The Purification of Insulating Oils (1926)

Clifford W. Towlson, Mightier Music: An outline of the proceedings of a Conference of Methodist Choirmasters (1934)

One of great fascination today—with regard to the money swilling around the Premier League –might be Tremar’s Football Investment Scientifically Applied (1924). Two that I personally would like to know more about before I begin to search out copies are: All About Passports (1922) by ‘Traveller’ and The Food of Immortality (1900) by W. B. Trevelyan. All three are currently unavailable on abebooks, incidentally.

It would be nice to know if the British Library managed to acquire all the books on its list. [RR]

4 thoughts on “Desiderata—a weekly publication for libraries and booksellers

  1. Mike

    The three ABE-dodgers can’t elude Worldcat, which has some informative subtitles at least, such as: “All about passports, endorsements, visas, renewals; how to obtain them without trouble, worry, loss of time or money”. Meanwhile there are only spiritual calories in Trevelyan’s book, and Tremar may have been talking about the pools.

    Reply
  2. Jot 101 Post author

    Many thanks Mike. As you say Tremar may have been talking about Football Pools, in which case it was probably the first book on the subject as they appear to have started about 1923. A coupon from that period would be a rare ephemera item…

    Reply
  3. Tommi Uschanov

    I guess it can’t be known for sure whether a reprint differs until it is available for examination. On the other hand, someone might be interested in the information that it doesn’t differ, for some “dog that didn’t bark” reason that might be hard to imagine beforehand. Here in Finland, the National Library welcomes all reprints that for some reason they haven’t got through the legal deposit system.

    I don’t normally find misplaced apostrophes worth commenting on, but it looks like the editorial was about a booksellers’ ring and not about a bookseller’s ring. Quite a difference in this case…!

    Reply
    1. Jot 101 Post author

      Thanks Tommi– I like the Sherlockian analogy. It could be argued that a reprint cannot be exactly the same otherwise it would not be a reprint…

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *